.
The Deceitful Excuses for the Rigged, Exclusionary Debates
by Harry Browne, Presidential candidate of the Libertarian Party
____________________________________________________

Excerpts from Harry Browne's Campaign Journal
____________________________________________________


      We frequently hear some Republican or Democrat say that the debates have to be limited to just those with 15% support in the polls because  there are over 200 people running for President officially, and you couldn't  possibly have them all on the stage.  But I receive a note from Jack Dean, calling my attention to information from Richard Winger (America's ballot-access expert). Winger points out that there are only 16 candidates who are on the ballot in even one state this year.  Only 7 candidates are on enough states to theoretically win a majority in the Electoral College.  Of the 9 candidates who can't win mathematically, the most active is on only ten state ballots. 

      The first debate should have been held in early September, well before voters had made up their minds on the basis of what little information was available.  That first debate should have included everyone with a mathematical ability to win the election -- in other words, seven candidates  (Bush, Gore, Browne, Nader, Buchanan, Hagelin, and Phillips). 

      There probably should have been two such debates, so that every voter would have an opportunity to view each of these candidates.  Having seven candidates would have been no more unwieldy than the early Republican primary debates. 

      By late September, the field should have been trimmed to, perhaps, the top five in the polls. At that point perhaps only those with 5% or more in the polls should be included.  And one or more of those candidates who don't have 5% now might have earned that much support through the exposure of the earlier debates. 

      The current debate system will always be rigged because the Republicans and Democrats operate the Debate Commission.  They raise corporate money to sponsor these political- advocacy debates by legally allowing the corporations to violate the campaign finance laws and to deduct the donations from their income tax -- something you and I are prohibited by laws from doing.  The Debate Commission is not something that sprung up in the free market; it is a creature of government. 

.
.
.
<BACK to 3rd Party Zingers